An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives
Table 6 Mean, Maximum and minimum values extracted from the star models of different groups
Value | Mean-choice | Max-choice | Mean-integration | Max-integration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | −2.473 | −2.106 | −1.735 | −2.179 | River-cities |
Mean | −0.387 | −0.066 | 0.035 | −0.447 | |
Maximum | 1.743 | 2.059 | 2.120 | 1.685 | |
Minimum | −2.919 | −1.541 | −2.099 | −2.000 | Non-river-cities |
Mean | −0.571 | −0.108 | −0.208 | −0.658 | |
Maximum | 1.743 | 1.424 | 1.705 | 0.973 | |
Minimum | −3.000 | −2.718 | −3.000 | −3.000 | Non-river-cities-high-cut |
Mean | −1.201 | −0.959 | −1.024 | −1.519 | |
Maximum | 1.297 | 0.388 | 1.159 | 0.141 | |
Minimum | −2.270 | −1.329 | −2.079 | −1.266 | River-cut |
Mean | 0.131 | 0.382 | 0.170 | 0.184 | |
Maximum | 2.432 | 3.000 | 2.019 | 3.000 | |
Minimum | −2.878 | −1.776 | −2.707 | −2.848 | River-bank |
Mean | 0.204 | −0.011 | 0.232 | −0.299 | |
Maximum | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | |
Minimum | −2.635 | −3.000 | −2.858 | −2.989 | River-high-cut |
Mean | −0.552 | −0.259 | −0.506 | −0.993 | |
Maximum | 1.784 | 2.059 | 1.745 | 1.435 |