An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives
Table 4 Number of project affected mouzas with percentage of area and population under different level of agricultural development in 2014 and 2007.
Stages of development | Number of mouzas | Name of mouzas | % of total population | % of total area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
After land acquisition (2014) | ||||
High | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL |
High middle | 4 | Nutandihi, Ramraydi, Gaighata, Shalika | 22.04 | 19.24 |
Low middle | 10 | Masru, Nitaipur, Banshkopna, Chantibandh, Ashna Shuli, Jamdedya, Kulpheni, Hatmari, Kharka Suli, Barju | 70.64 | 73.12 |
Low | 3 | Arabari, Khairisol, Ghagrasol | 7.32 | 7.64 |
Before land acquisition (2007) | ||||
High | 1 | Kharka Suli | 0.26 | 7.38 |
High middle | 6 | Masru, Nutandihi, Banshkopna, Chantibandh, Ashna Shuli, Kulpheni | 39.45 | 46.45 |
Low middle | 10 | Nitaipur, Ramraydi, Jamdedya, Gaighata, Hatmari, Shalika, Arabari, Khairisol, Barju, Ghagrasol | 60.30 | 46.17 |
Low | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL |