Skip to main content

An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives

Table 2 Criticisms of Alexander’s second theory of architecture: development and documentation

From: Christopher Alexander’s A Pattern Language: analysing, mapping and classifying the critical response

[#]

Issue

#A

Criticism

#S

Source

5

Scholarship—documentation

4

The definitions of ‘patterns’ and ‘forces’ are inexplicit

(Lea 1994; Silva and Paraizo 2008)

6

Scholarship—documentation

4

Exemplars of good design are difficult to comprehend

(Kohn 2002)

7

Scholarship—documentation

4

The efforts and insights of scholars developing similar themes are rarely acknowledged

(Broadbent 1980; Elsheshtawy 2001; Kohn 2002)

8

Scholarship—documentation

4

Explanations of pattern synthesis and language structure are inadequate

(Salingaros 2000)

9

Testing

Scholarship—documentation

4

Greater numbers of patterns were never proven to produce superior environments

25, 27

 

10

Scholarship—presentation

3, 4

Deliberately provocative statements damage Alexander’s credibility

(King 1993; Kohn 2002)

11

Scholarship—presentation

3, 4

Universal and dogmatic statements discourage engagement and criticism

(Broadbent 1980; Protzen 1980; Kohn 2002; Messina 2003; Walker 2003; Bhatt 2010)

12

Scholarship—presentation

3, 4

The canonical texts physically resemble bibles and imply authority that discourages criticism

(Broadbent 1980; Dovey 1990)

13

Testing

3, 4

Patterns are driven by ideology and based on faulty evidence, or non-rigorous reasoning

23, 24, 25

(Montgomery 1970; Broadbent 1980; Protzen 1980; Dovey 1990; Salingaros 2000; Kohn 2002; Saunders 2002a; Bhatt 2010)

14

Testing

Patterns may be impossible to rigorously test

(Protzen 1980; Salingaros 2000)

15

Logic and reasoning

3

Informational fallacies protect the theory from contrary information and experience

21

(Protzen 1980)

16

Logic and reasoning

3

The theory’s pre-industrial procurement strategy is unsuitable for modern societies

23

(Gelernter 1983; Elsheshtawy 2001)

17

Logic and reasoning

3

Alexander espouses pure freedom but demands adherence to his rules

(Broadbent 1980; Protzen 1980; Saunders 2002a; Walker 2003)

18

Logic and reasoning

3, 4

Alexander pursues traditional design through anti-traditional means

(Kalb 2014)

19

Logic and reasoning

3

The populace have compromised taste due to modernist brainwashing but also prefer Alexander’s designs

(Bornstein 2005/2006)

  1. [#], criticism identifier; #A, antecedent criticism; #S, subsequent criticism