An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives
Table 4 Rating and weights of factors in the interaction and engagement category
Interaction and engagement | Rating averagea ± SD | Experts opinion | Users opinion | Experts-users | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight (%) | Points (170.0) | Weight (%) | Points (170.0) | Weight (%) | Points (170.0) | ||
Compact/mixed-use dev | 3.77 ± 1.06 | 9.11 | 15.49 | 9.71 | 16.51 | 9.41 | 16.00 |
Civic/community engagement | 3.66 ± 0.87 | 9.30 | 15.82 | 8.92 | 15.17 | 9.11 | 15.50 |
Open/gathering spaces | 6.18 ± 1.34 | 13.82 | 23.51 | 16.98 | 28.87 | 15.40 | 26.19 |
Public realm/interaction | 3.45 ± 0.73 | 7.35 | 12.50 | 9.87 | 16.78 | 8.61 | 14.64 |
Design quality/aesthetics | 1.25 ± 0.21 | 4.05 | 6.89 | 2.16 | 3.67 | 3.11 | 5.28 |
Safe and appealing streets | 6.08 ± 1.59 | 16.87 | 28.69 | 13.42 | 22.81 | 15.14 | 25.75 |
Walkable streets | 2.92 ± 0.93 | 6.54 | 11.12 | 8.04 | 13.68 | 7.29 | 12.40 |
Connected and open community | 5.41 ± 1.23 | 14.44 | 24.56 | 12.55 | 21.34 | 13.49 | 22.95 |
Access to recreational facilities | 3.07 ± 1.07 | 5.97 | 10.15 | 9.34 | 15.88 | 7.65 | 13.01 |
Street furniture | 1.44 ± 0.23 | 4.49 | 7.63 | 2.67 | 4.53 | 3.58 | 6.08 |
Availability of seats | 2.89 ± 0.73 | 8.06 | 13.71 | 6.35 | 10.80 | 7.21 | 12.25 |