Skip to main content

An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives

Table 7 Rating and distributed weight of factors in the sustainable behavior category

From: Evaluating social sustainability in Jordanian residential neighborhoods: a combined expert-user approach

Sustainable behavior

Rating averagea ± SD

Experts opinion

Users opinion

Experts-users

Weight (%)

Points (212.0)

Weight (%)

Points (212.0)

Weight (%)

Points (212.0)

Green spaces

10.53 ± 2.73

18.84

39.95

22.36

47.42

20.60

43.68

Environmental justice

3.31 ± 1.02

5.97

12.66

7.00

14.84

6.48

13.75

Sustainable buildings

2.56 ± 0.64

4.01

8.50

6.00

12.71

5.00

10.61

Rainwater harvesting

2.01 ± 0.14

2.42

5.14

5.45

11.56

3.94

8.35

Conservation of habitat

4.29 ± 1.54

7.05

14.94

9.72

20.61

8.38

17.78

Waste reduction/treatment

4.78 ± 1.27

8.31

17.62

10.41

22.07

9.36

19.85

Land-use optimization

3.22 ± 0.93

7.35

15.58

5.25

11.12

6.30

13.35

Eco-friendly transportation

9.75 ± 2.12

21.80

46.23

16.33

34.62

19.07

40.42

Efficient lighting

2.24 ± 0.76

5.20

11.02

3.58

7.59

4.39

9.30

Water efficient landscaping

1.61 ± 0.23

3.35

7.10

2.96

6.27

3.15

6.68

Sustainability awareness

3.18 ± 0.78

6.80

14.42

5.66

12.00

6.23

13.21

Sustainability regulations

3.62 ± 1.02

8.90

18.86

5.29

11.21

7.09

15.04

  1. aCR-experts: 0.03–0.08/CR-users: 0.06–0.09