An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives
Exogenous factors | Evidence from cases | |
---|---|---|
Urban and socioeconomic context | • Urban structure and connectivity • Existence of socio-economic disparities in the area • Multicultural environment • Gentrification | • 3,8,9,10,13,14 • 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,11,13,14 • 2,3,4,7,8,9,11,13,14 • 2,3,4,7,9,12 |
Social values and dynamics of the cultural ecosystem | • Recognition of successful cultural projects aiming at social transformation • Commons as a social strategy • Sensitivity towards equity at societal and cultural professional level • Cultural activism • Collaborative environment | • All projects • 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,13,14 • all projects • 2,3,4,7,8,11,13,14 • All projects |
Incidence of public policies | • Existence of specific budget allocations to support cultural projects with social impact • High interdepartmental collaboration • Co-participation of diverse organisations and institutions in the development of public policies • Strong discursive and political leadership for a social agenda in culture | • 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 • 1,2,3,4,8,9,11,13,14 • 1,2,3,8,11,13,14 • 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 |
Supporting policies from philanthropic institutions | • Existence of specific budget allocations to support cultural projects with social impact • Mentoring and training accompaniment • Discursive and lobby commitment merging social and cultural dynamics | • 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,14 • 5,6,8 • 2,3,4,5,6,8,14 |