Assessment of community park as social interaction place for rural communities: a case study of Peyi Community Bwari Abuja

Adedayo, O. F.; Akingbohungbe, D. O.; Ale, A. T.; Abdullahi, A. P.; Adegoke, M. A.

doi:10.1186/s40410-023-00208-2

City, Territory and Architecture

An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives

Table 1 Respondents opinion on of social interaction and spaces within the community park

From: Assessment of community park as social interaction place for rural communities: a case study of Peyi Community Bwari Abuja

Variable	Very good X1	Good X2	Poor X3	Very poor X4	Sum	Mean	Interpretation
Adequacy of your interaction with people of different religious affiliation	49	54	27	16	146	1.640449	Good
Pleasantry level in living with people	26	94	30	32	182	2.000000	Good
Use of park as meeting point to friends and families?	17	48	51	52	168	2.366197	Good
Level of interaction between people in public place?	17	88	54	52	211	2.293478	Good
Relationship with people of different tribe and culture in the park	25	94	27	32	178	2.000000	Good
Level of participation in social events held at park	24	92	57	28	201	2.093750	Good
Interaction with people of different level of education qualification at park	24	80	51	44	199	2.163043	Good
Interaction with people of different socio-economic category in the community	18	96	45	48	207	2.225806	Good
Adequacy of facilities within park	8	48	156	40	252	2.680851	Poor
Security within the park	17	98	66	28	209	2.200000	Good
Accessibility to the park for users	15	86	57	44	202	2.295455	Good
Adequacy of spaces provided in the park	9	46	123	84	262	2.787234	Poor
Comfort of the play area for users	21	96	54	32	203	2.136842	Good
Privacy within the park	5	32	156	76	269	2.923913	Poor
Opportunities for interaction provided by spaces within the park	13	110	57	28	208	2.212766	Good
Suitability of park for all age groups	2	40	183	36	261	2.836957	Poor
Friendship development opportunities as a function of arrangement of facilities	16	100	54	20	190	2.134831	Good
Conveniences provide within park	5	52	141	60	258	2.774194	Poor
Landscape features within park	11	94	69	48	222	2.387097	Good
Safety of users of park at night time	3	38	174	60	275	2.894737	Poor
Visual comfort within park	11	114	51	24	200	2.197802	Good

Back to article page