Skip to main content

An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives

Table 12 Pairwise comparison matrix for the criteria

From: A new approach for configuring modular floating cities: assessing modular floating platforms by means of analytic hierarchy process

Criterion

Shape

Triangular

Squared

Hexagonal

Octagonal

Dodecagonal

Seakeeping

Triangular

1.000

0.500

0.250

0.333

0.250

Squared

2.000

1.000

0.333

0.500

0.333

Hexagonal

4.000

3.000

1.000

2.000

1.000

Octagonal

3.000

2.000

0.500

1.000

0.500

Dodecagonal

4.000

3.000

1.000

2.000

1.000

Sum

14.000

9.500

3.083

5.833

3.083

 

CR = 0.008

Modularity

Triangular

1.000

2.000

3.000

7.000

6.000

Squared

0.500

1.000

2.000

6.000

5.000

Hexagonal

0.333

0.500

1.000

5.000

4.000

Octagonal

0.143

0.167

0.200

1.000

2.000

Dodecagonal

0.167

0.200

0.250

0.500

1.000

Sum

2.143

3.867

6.450

19.500

18.000

 

CR = 0.042

Zoning and Circulation

Triangular

1.000

0.167

0.200

0.167

0.143

Squared

6.000

1.000

0.500

1.000

0.500

Hexagonal

5.000

2.000

1.000

2.000

0.333

Octagonal

6.000

1.000

0.500

1.000

0.500

Dodecagonal

7.000

2.000

3.000

2.000

1.000

Sum

25.000

6.167

5.200

6.167

2.476

 

CR = 0.046

Feasibility

Triangular

1.000

0.250

2.000

4.000

5.000

Squared

4.000

1.000

5.000

7.000

8.000

Hexagonal

0.500

0.200

1.000

3.000

4.000

Octagonal

0.250

0.143

0.333

1.000

2.000

Dodecagonal

0.200

0.125

0.250

0.500

1.000

Sum

5.950

1.718

8.583

15.500

20.000

 

CR = 0.039