- Research article
- Open Access
The everyday urban environment of migrant labourers in Gulf Cities: the case of the old centre of Doha, Qatar
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 20 October 2016
- Accepted: 2 February 2017
- Published: 8 February 2017
Preventing the complete social restructuring and the relocation of migrant communities from traditional cores in Gulf cities to newly urbanized areas is a rising urban and social challenge. The Al Asmakh district in the old centre of Doha is an important example that manifests the current encounter between rising investment pressures and preserving the local identity including the particular urban life and spatial settings that have evolved over several decades. This paper presents key research findings with respect to the lived urban spaces of the Al Asmakh in order to exemplify the potential loss of very distinctive neighbourhoods and to introduce particular characteristics of urban spaces and the way migrant communities appropriate them. As part of a learning experiment undertaken at Qatar University in 2014, structured field surveys, systematic observations as well as behavioural mapping techniques were adopted as important approaches to investigation. The outcomes reveal stimulating dynamics between migrant communities and their environments. It also postulates that city residents have the capacity to recover swiftly from difficulties and resilience in spite of an impeding and hampering context. The paper concludes with projections of how contemporary transformation processes in Gulf cities will have to be based on diversity and social inclusion. Such a transformation should stem from the recognition that migrant communities need to have access to develop their own settings that relate to their routine spatial practices while securing the economic basis of many migrant labourers.
- Migrant labourers
- Everyday urbanism
- Socio-spatial practice
- Environment-behaviour studies
- Gulf cities
Since the launch of oil production migrants have settled in the historic city cores of Gulf cities due to the move of local populations to new suburban neighbourhoods (Nagy 1997). The rapid shift from compact vernacular desert settlements to motorized cities characterized by urban sprawl led to a strong separation of historic city cores and new urban expansions. Steadily, historic cores lost their importance due to out-dated infrastructure and rather limited accessibility. This was parallel to the move of main retail centres towards the urban periphery and the newly urbanized areas. While shopping malls on city outskirts began to cater to higher income groups, the mixed-use central areas accommodated the various services and shops for migrant communities leading to a relatively distinctive economic environment with direct exchange and interaction between groups with lower income (Salama and Wiedmann 2013).
Most migrant communities residing in historic city cores have been from the Indian Subcontinent (e.g. India, Nepal and Bangladesh), South-East-Asian (e.g. Philippines) and Middle Eastern (e.g. Egypt, Jordan and Sudan) origins (Gardner et al. 2013, p. 4). In addition to a large percentage of migrants, who only dwell a limited number of years in Gulf cities without their families, a stable and growing community has remained from the first generations of migrants who decided to settle after the oil production commenced. Both the settled and the continuously exchanging majority of migrants have created distinctive neighbourhoods and particular ways of urban life, induced by their own cultures (Nagy 2006). The contemporary street life in downtown areas is thus an expression of a large part of the overall population of Gulf cities, who have experienced an increasing struggle to be heard and to be integrated within today’s urbanism (Gardner 2011).
In most recent years, downtown areas have begun to attract a new dimension of investment interests in real estate due to their central location and the still existing built heritage from the pre-oil era, which was rediscovered by decision-makers as an important factor for attracting new businesses and tourism as well as establishing general urban identity (Salama 2014a, 2015). Large-scale projects, such as Souq Waqif and Msheireb redevelopment in Doha or Bastakiyah in Dubai, have led to an urban transformation process instigating gentrification and leading to higher rental rates and a subsequent move of lower income migrant communities to urban peripheries (Wiedmann et al. 2013). This gradual replacement of communities, who have had a significant impact on these urban spaces for decades based on their daily needs and cultural backgrounds, will subsequently lead to the end of a significant element of contemporary Gulf cities rooted in long-term migration characterized by a particular spatial-economic structure and a high level of spatial diversity.
A review of a number of concepts provides a theoretical reference for understanding the notions of ‘everyday urban environment’ and ‘socio-spatial practice.’ These concepts emerge from disciplines and areas of interest that include environmental psychology or environment-behaviour studies, new urbanism and sociology. Within the field of environment-behaviour studies. Amos Rapoport argues that the physical elements of an environment are of direct influence on the relationships and activities that happen within them (Rapoport 1990, 2005). The built environment is thus both a force defining human movements as well as a result of the overall human spatial practice in one place (Sanoff 1974). The long-term relationship between actual residents and their surroundings will inevitably lead to a spatial expression of the social structure and eventually to a representation of their various needs and preferences as community or a group of individuals who share a substantial number of values.
Everyday urbanism is a concept that has been widely theorised in contemporary literature (Chase et al. 1999; Goonewardena, et al. 2008; Edwards and Charley 2011) with three main qualities: it is portrayed as non-utopian since it capitalises on the everyday reality of ordinary life with little or no interest in debating the ideal built environment; as conversational since it incorporates multiplicity and simultaneity with openness to populist or mainstream public informality, and as non-structuralist since it softens the relationship between the designed environment and the socio-spatial practice of users (Kelbaugh 2000). In the context of discussing everyday urbanism, reference should be made to the ‘conceived-perceived-lived’ triad of Henri Lefebvre. In this respect, conceived space is based on decisions made by the public sector exemplified by practitioners, decision-makers and others who are in a position to impose their personal notion of ‘order’ on the concrete world. Perceived space represents the interactions between people and institutions: the space where movement and interaction take place and where networks develop and materialise. Lived space, which represents our focus in this programme, is the way people actually live and interact with their environment; the direct unconscious, non-verbal relationship of humans to space. Everyday urbanism describes everyday life as a receptacle of all types of meanings that range from the ordinary to the extraordinary (Lefebvre 1991; Purcell 2002). It focuses on the everyday environment of the activities of the public while exploring the typically oversimplified domains of daily existence as a crucial field in contemporary culture (Harrison 2007). It involves shifting from the elite decision-maker and the egoist/pragmatist professional architect-planner to the enabler-architect and the ordinary layperson.
‘The right to the city’ is another concept that was originally coined by Lefebvre as a responsive appeal for a new and radical kind of urban politics; it is currently in widespread discussion and usage, particularly in more political-activist contexts. In his essay ‘The Right to the City,’ Harvey rearticulated Lefebvre’s core belief, arguing that “the right to the city is far more than the individual liberty to access urban resources: it is a right to change ourselves by changing the city.” (Harvey 2010: 315). Rooted in imagination, the ‘lived space’ is essentially subjective, a passive experience wherein the outer physical space resonates with the inner imagination, which makes symbolic use of outer objects, retaining or rejecting them according to an arbitrary, because subjective, though often cohesive system of priorities and preferences. Specific locations within a given vicinity can, for example, become focal points, familiar attractions, or environments that are significantly attached to. This is due to their position and status within the lived space of a particular community of people who use that vicinity—a mosque, a graveyard, a square. Corresponding with the views of Rapoport and Sanoff, the public realm of urban spaces can express the inner relationships between inhabitants and their built environment by being either used or abandoned. Thus, Lefebvre (1991) argued that the complex relationship between inhabitants and existing urban spaces will lead to another evolutionary chapter within urban development patterns due to the rising public opinion and the subsequent resistance to top-down decision-making. This view was further reinforced in the environment-behaviour and community planning literature (Sanoff 2000). Yet, the realm of environment-behaviour studies took a different turn expressed in the systematic examination of human behaviour as it relates to the everyday urban environment.
Human behaviour is thus a clear indicator of whether urban spaces are important factors in everyday life or if they are rejected and avoided. While the absence of any street life can have various reasons, such as security concerns or introverted lifestyles rooted in cultural particularities, the actual activities can be observed and evaluated to gather in-depth insights if public urban spaces are perceived as attractive or repulsive surroundings. Subsequently, urban spaces can be identified as either key centres inviting a wide range of social groups to interact or as segregated spaces with limited access to any form of social inclusion and thus often abused and neglected (Burgess 1925; Altman 1975; Whyte 1980; Gehl 1987; Mitchell 1996). Primarily, behavioural studies need to be integrated with various spatial analyses of the local built environment, its historic roots as well as its various components in order to gain insights into the particular factors that lead to the complex social-spatial practice of a specific community group.
Due to the emerging pearl trade, which has led to the first phase of migration at the end of the nineteenth century, Doha has witnessed a fairly early diversification of its population. The migration of merchant families from India and Iran as well as East-African slaves led to various social groups living in segregated areas. This first migrant generation was granted the Qatari nationality once Qatar declared independence in 1971 (Fromherz 2012). The main transformation process however was initiated by the oil production, which began in the 1940s and led to a rigid and extensive modernisation period (Salama and Wiedmann 2013). The first modern infrastructural networks were planned by Western consultants and built by South-Asian labourers. The first schools were established and teachers from Egypt, North Africa and the Levant settled in Doha. The rapid urbanisation led to the end of desert and nomad communities while the rise of Doha as a capital city instigated a concentration of all major infrastructural developments in the new capital (Remali et al. 2016).
The move of the local population to newly built suburban districts, which offered the best infrastructural supply and the ability to use imported cars as the desired mode of transportation as well as a highly increased private living area per person, led to the subsequent move of migrants to the traditional neighbourhoods, such as Al Asmakh. In many areas, the traditional courtyard buildings were replaced by multi-story apartment buildings as well as one-story commercial enterprises (Nagy 2000). The first zoning efforts inhibited the spread of commercial land-use, which has only been permitted along the main road grid (MMAA 1986). Consequently, the inner district’s residential layout was mainly preserved. The limited access by car also prevented higher urban densities and thus a substantial part of historic buildings was kept intact during the various phases of modernisation. The lack of investment in new developments however led to a state of continuous deterioration.
Since the end of the twentieth century, a new development vision was introduced in various realms to transform Doha into a regional hub city. Large-scale public investments led to rapid urban growth and thus new migration patterns. While the construction boom caused the move of significant numbers of construction workers, mainly from the Indian Subcontinent, the real-estate associated services and the newly emerging economies led to the arrival of new migrant groups with medium to high income from different parts of the world. These new potential tenants led to a relatively new phenomenon, the introduction of housing for higher income groups in the city core.
In recent years, various initiatives have been launched to redevelop the Al Asmakh district. While the Msheireb approach was followed in many aspects due to the introduction of large-scale master plans, a certain level of preservation initiatives was integrated. Nevertheless, the future upgrading of the district will inevitably lead to the move of migrant communities due to the expected rise of rental prices in central and well accessible areas (Colliers International 2014). Due to the narrow streets and the complex land ownership by a large number of landlords most inner district areas of the Al Asmakh district have however not been replaced yet by modern developments and a large amount of historic residential buildings, which are part of Doha’s small architectural heritage, can still be found. The lack of modern infrastructure in combination with the missing investment in the building substance led to further deterioration. This deterioration is visible in form of run-down facades as well as entire buildings, which have collapsed and cannot be inhabited anymore.
The Wadi Msheireb Street in the North has become an important investment focus due to its role as the main urban artery to large development sites, such as Souq Waqif and the emerging Msheireb project. The Al Asmakh Street is another key access road since it links the A-Ring Road with the historic core. Abdullah Bin Thani Street is the main inner access road separating the district in two main areas. Due to the concentration of services and commercial developments along the main road grid, which provides a certain level of accessibility by car, the inner residential areas have remained densely built with hardly any public realm.
The main public spaces in these inner district areas can be found in form of street corners, along pedestrian areas and in the surroundings of small mosques. Cold stores, barber shops and small cafes have settled along these sites in order to serve the local residents. Office workers hardly visit these inner district areas and the high level of isolation led to an almost parallel urban environment within these densely built and populated neighbourhoods. This segregation has led to rather differing perceptions of the overall population regarding these residential areas within Doha’s historic centre. While many labourers and other migrant groups, who have settled in Doha for decades, have been experiencing these neighbourhoods as an everyday urban space and main local identity, most high-income groups and recently arrived migrants lack any personal relation to these essential parts of Doha. The main exception are locals, who often own properties in Al Asmakh or similar districts and who associate these urban areas with their ancestors’ neighbourhoods and the first phase of modern urbanization, when most commercial activities were still concentrated in Doha’s historic core (Salama and Wiedmann 2016).
According to the Ministry of Development Planning and Statistics in 2010 and 2015, the number of inhabitants currently residing in the Al Asmakh district has dropped from 4128 to 2086, of which almost 94% are male (MDPS 2015). The big dominance of male residents is a clear sign for a large percentage of labourers, mainly from the Indian Subcontinent, engaged in construction or in other low income sectors. These migrants are not permitted to settle with their families in Qatar and their contracts are usually short-term (Gardner et al. 2013, p. 4).
In total, there are 264 buildings, of which 251 are currently used. Due to the fact that there are only 432 apartments/units, there is a high occupancy rate per housing unit and labourers as well as most migrants usually share accommodation. The high urban density and the lack of living area per resident have led to a rather extensive use of the urban space/outdoors. The low income of residents and the lack of higher income groups visiting the area have resulted in that integrated commercial services are reduced to minimum needs and demands. The resulting economic activities have thus led to very particular spatial conditions and a strong differentiation between main roads and back-sided inner district areas.
The methodology was developed as part of the elective class ARCT 420: Environment-Behaviour Studies, offered to fourth year architecture students at Qatar University. The class adopted the theoretical underpinnings outlined above with a focus on the conjecture that the built environment is not simply a background against which human actions take place, but reflects and shapes human assumptions, beliefs, feelings and behaviours. Coupled with the typical format of delivery of lectures and presentations, the class offered a series of in-class and out-of-class exercises and assignments that employ various learning styles which prepare students to a more comprehensive structured learning experience in the form of a group research project. Entitled “Understanding the Socio-spatial Practices of Migrant Communities in the Traditional Core of Doha,” the project was an endeavour to learn about the dynamics of those communities in relation to the everyday urban environment.
Migrant communities have established ways to integrate their immediate needs in urban spaces or residential buildings despite public monitoring and licensing.
The lack of public realm and leisure spaces has led to the use of the ‘in-between’ spaces and un-built sites such as, for instance, the establishment of informal cricket fields in parking spaces, or the use of a sidewalk or a street corner as a social space.
Functional Attributes: Diversity of use; environmental responsiveness; appropriateness of form in relation to use; contextual accessibility; diversity of gathering nodes; visibility and inclusion of iconic elements; clarity of edges and boundaries; quality of architectural and landscape elements; adaptability and opportunities for appropriation.
Social Attributes: Promoting effective user experience; social inclusivity; engaging diverse social groups with space; accommodating diverse social activities; promoting interaction among different social groups in terms of age, cultural/ethnic background, or gender; serving different social groups in terms of food option and landscape elements; and social accessibility in terms of location and transportation options.
Perceptual Attributes: Human experience; comfort and relaxation; personal space and privacy; safety and security in terms of boundaries, availability of security personnel and cameras; memorable architectural character; signage system; navigation and movement; spatial experience; reflecting local identity; and attractiveness.
Each category involves checklists with a scoring system. Checklists are phrased in the form of questions underlying each category. Questions are designed in a manner that reflects the essence of each attribute. Numerical scores are assigned to the questions to represent the degree of appropriateness using four-points scale where 1 represents highly inappropriate and 4 represents highly appropriate. Scores are averaged and an overall score for each urban space is then calculated. Concluding observations-based comments together with supporting illustrations are developed, while highlighting positive and negative attributes in each space. In order to ensure objectivity and reliability, students were requested to conduct the assessment individually and collectively.
The second tool was direct observation and behavioural mapping; systematic methods for describing what users of a space actually do there. This is a direct approach that aims at understanding the dynamics of people and their interaction with the urban environment; it views people as ‘objects’ by recording their periodic behaviour. Valuable information can be obtained when behaviour is systematically recorded (Sanoff 1991). Unplanned observation may result in inadequate findings that may reveal only what seems to be already obvious. Systematic observation of behaviour involves four aspects: people, activities, setting or space and timing. In this research, a combined unobtrusive mapping technique, which integrates ‘place-centred’ mapping and ‘individual-centred’ mapping, is used. Place-centred mapping aims at observing actions in a particular setting or portion of a public space; these are recorded on floor plans, maps or diagrams. Individual-centred mapping records the tasks, activities, and movements of people throughout the investigated space: it represents a systematic learning about a particular group of individuals whose activities are distributed throughout a specific period of time (Salama et al. 2013a). The studies aimed at the documentation of different migrant communities’ behaviour within various lived urban spaces in the Al Asmakh district. A number of criteria were examined to distinguish between public spaces in street corners and along streets and to understand periodic behaviour during week days and weekends as well as in afternoons and evenings in order to detect key characteristics about the dialectics of migrant communities and their everyday urban environment.
By observing the general backgrounds of users and visitors, social attributes were explored. It can be stated that the district lacks social inclusion and that certain areas are mainly inhabited by particular cultural groups due to the fact that labourers are accommodated by their sponsors. The ‘kafala’ system is rooted in both law and custom and establishes that entry for the purposes of work requires a local sponsor. This local sponsor is responsible for the accommodation of his labourers (Gardner et al. 2014, p. 7). As a result, many labour accommodations are shared by groups from the same cultural or ethnic backgrounds and according to a survey of Human Rights Watch (2012, p. 65) they are often reviewed as cramped and insufficient.
Based on the fact that a large percentage of the migrant community only resides a limited period of time in Qatar based on short-term contracts, language communities have a direct impact on spatial practice and certain places have become the main meeting points for particular migrant groups. The lack of parks, sport grounds and sitting areas has however led to a very limited number of social activities, which are primarily reduced to exchanging news, trading, visiting barber shops, drinking tea as well as gathering around mosques after prayer times. In spite of the proximity to main tourist centres and cultural attractions, such as Souq Waqif and the Museum of Islamic Arts, hardly any tourists can be observed in the area. While there is a dominance of the male population in the district, a minor number of women and children were observed, who however avoided most areas and used roads as transitional spaces between homes and shops.
The examination of the perceptual attributes included the degree to which urban spaces foster the users’ attachment to them while offering opportunities for an intensive human experience. Due to the state of deterioration and the general lack of landscaping as well as landmarks, most urban spaces can hardly be assessed as attractive environments fostering high levels of interaction and thus identification process between inhabitants and their surroundings. A main deficit in this respect is the general lack of urban spaces generating a certain degree of comfort and relaxation by being less exposed to traffic or being defined by certain urban design elements. While boundaries between more private residential and public areas along the two streets are defined to a certain extent, the general perception of urban safety suffers from hardly observed spaces within narrow side roads. Yet, the greatest potential can be found in areas, where historic buildings have remained.
Walking Tour assessment results for Wadi Msheireb Street and Al Asmakh Street
Wadi Msheireb street
Al Asmagh street
Towards the evenings the flow of people increases from different directions. Larger groups join for social interaction after their prayers in mosques. Due to limited living areas in residences, which are mainly used for sleeping, most labourers have adopted and appropriated their urban surroundings as an important space to socialise and to relax in spite of all spatial deficits. The proximity of the Msheireb construction sites has also resulted in crowds of construction workers waiting for their transportation during the evenings of the weekdays. Due to the lack of any purchasing power of these social groups shops along the main commercial roads hardly benefit from the new visitors. Their gathering in large groups has furthermore led to congested areas preventing efficient pedestrian movement and contributing to the particular circumstance of these urban spaces as neglected back-sided areas of the new mega projects along the coast. These perceived class spatial and class or social boundaries are particularly visible during evenings, when labourers come home to rest after a long day of work, gathering in street corners to socialise with friends and acquaintances.
In addition to weekday evenings, intensive social interaction was observed on weekends. The lack of street furniture led to informal sitting groups on sidewalks and on steps across shop fronts as well as the striking phenomenon of bringing own furniture to the outdoors, particularly in the case of older men in proximity to their businesses. This led to distinctive sitting arrangements rooted in the direct interaction and spatial practice of people. Furthermore, male labourers have been frequently observed to rest and sleep in corners creating a socially problematic atmosphere of a homeless and stranded community. At the same time, the weekends represent the qualities of a highly integrated residential district with mixed land uses in Doha. Various commercial activities were observed, such as trading goods along the street and frequent visits of small stores. The large number of low-income labourers has led to a spatial economic setting of rather evenly distributed and well accessible services for everyday needs, which has led to a reasonably dynamic but limited market area,
The exploration of the socio-spatial practice of migrant communities in the traditional core of Doha provides an excellent opportunity for students to learn about the history and profile of the city while understanding the unique particularities of issues relevant to environment-behaviour studies and the everyday urban environment including social interaction, appropriation, flexibility and adaptability. Nonetheless, the analysis and discussions offer important insights into planning and development efforts. Due to the fact that labourers, who are the large majority of residents in the Al Asmakh district, have limited access to shopping malls and high profile public spaces, the neighbourhood’s surroundings have thus become the main public realm for any interaction and thus both individual and collective spatial experience. The high concentration of social interaction during weekends has led to the survival of many small businesses and services catering to various cultural groups based on the relative high level of land-use integration and low rental rates in deteriorating buildings. The overcrowded area and the resulting lack of private spaces have however transformed the Al Asmakh district into a highly conflicted urban setting. While in the past, key areas, such as Souq Najada, were important nodal points for social interaction of residents in a very suitable public environment (Samahy and Hutzell 2014), the rising investment interests have led to a gradual replacement of these areas by launching hotels and other commercial developments to benefit from the proximity to Souq Waqif and the waterfront promenade.
In essence, two opposed urban spaces are currently facing each other, which can be particularly observed in the case of the Al Asmakh district. While on the one hand, new mega projects generate globalised images appealing to investors and tourists, the bordering historic districts have first become a place of refuge for a large figure of labourers migrating to Qatar during a short period of time leading to highly overcrowded, informal and fragmented spatial urban conditions (Wiedmann et al. 2013). In very recent years, these districts themselves have become objects of investment interests leading to a new era of potential gentrification in Doha’s central areas and a subsequent move of migrant communities from areas they managed to spatially appropriate for their needs.
The Msheireb development site can thus be seen as the clear antithesis to the neighbouring Al Asmakh district and all remaining historic urban spaces in downtown areas (Salama 2014b). The new top-down master planned project proposed for the redevelopment of the Al Asmakh will create state-of-the-art urban environments with high rental prices and for social groups with profiles dramatically different from those of current migrant labourers. While the proposal considers the preservation of key traditional houses, it may result in eliminating an important chapter of the city’s history. It is anticipated that when higher income groups move into the newly developed project they will hardly interact with neighbouring districts, if no major public interventions were created to support interaction and safety. Therefore, the move of new social groups to central areas has to be seen as a major opportunity to foster social interaction and to strengthen the small local businesses. Nonetheless, this can only be achieved with sensitive and gradual upgrading processes and a high level of integrated affordable housing for lower income groups.
The major planning challenge of creating sustainable city centres in Gulf cities is rooted in the inner investment dynamics, which have led to a rapid increase of land prices in central areas and thus a continuous tension between speculators keeping their land and deteriorating properties on the one hand and new government-supported initiatives targeting short-term gains on the other. New planning regulations keep facing an increasing struggle to accommodate the high demands of enhanced built densities and the reality of missing infrastructural capacities on the ground. The fragmented development of large-scale projects has contributed to an urban environment that lacks spatial cohesion and integration. The newly launched waterfront developments along the historic centres have thus triggered a quite complex situation between establishing new spatial realities during a short period of time by a small number of mega projects and the spatial results of decades of urban development driven by the general segregation between the residential areas for migrants and locals. Therefore, new planning regulations should cultivate a sense of social inclusion rather than a fragmented agglomeration of segregated communities.
The previous low standard of infrastructure, the initial lack of accessibility due to narrow roads and the high demand for housing have early transformed historic cores of Gulf cities and their surrounding districts as main residential areas for migrants. Subsequently, the central districts have therefore accommodated a significant share of migrant labourers. This has led to spatial urban conditions that reflect various needs as well as the limited purchasing power and thus restricted economic growth thereby leading to a gradual deterioration of the built environment. The rapid replacement of traditional areas will unavoidably lead to new mass housing areas in the urban periphery, which will hardly accommodate the high diversity of needs of migrant communities for affordable price tags. The relocated communities will find themselves in a challenging newly built environment missing the long-term attachment. While the spatial conditions and deteriorating buildings in districts, such as Al Asmakh, have permitted a certain level of informal adaptation of urban spaces, the newly developed housing projects and their surroundings on the peripheries and industrial areas hardly enable the individual spatial appropriation of migrant groups.
Thus, contemporary urban planning in the Gulf region has to respond to the emerging conflicting perceptions and values in historic centres, which are being envisioned and planned as mixed-use downtowns and new main hubs for services. Urban space diversity is however highly dependent on social inclusion and in turn the potential of various social groups to interact. The mediation between short-term investment interests and long-term community-driven development patterns is particularly challenging in the Gulf region due to the evident contrast between the small minority of locals and the large majority of migrants with limited prospects to stay long-term. Urban spaces are consequently a direct expression of the core problem of today’s Gulf cities as being the result of large-scale investments and top-down strategies with hardly any demand-driven dynamics. The gradual replacement of inner city districts will erase the last remaining urban spaces that will become as part of a collective memory rather than actual physical environment.
Urban space diversity is seen worldwide as a precondition to overcome boundaries and it is particularly challenging to establish in fast growing emerging cities (Fainstein 2005). The rapid globalisation of the Gulf region has recently led to various rising conflicts between preserving the local identity and enabling the accommodation of migrant communities according to their needs as well as cultural preferences (Fox et al. 2006). It should be emphasised that master planners and decision-makers in multicultural cities need to adopt a high level of responsiveness to envision urban spaces attract instead of alienate the various migrant groups (Sanderock, 1998). In this respect, the investment in state-of-the-art public spaces along mixed-use streets can play an important role in establishing more sustainable communities by enhancing the economic dimension and by promoting a continuous exchange between social groups (Peter Jones et al. 2007). While authorities, such as Qatar’s General Secretariat of Development Planning (2009), have launched various programs to foster more sustainable communities, the major focus has remained on the native population (GSDP 2009).
The indecisiveness of officially integrating migrant communities on the long-term has led to the spatial reality of segregated communities and parallel worlds. The gentrification of historic city cores via large scale mega projects will only lead to the relocation of the problem of social segregation with potentially more social, economic and environmental risks attached. Many examples worldwide suggest that new settlements along the urban periphery deprive large communities from the essential spatial needs, namely the high level of accessibility and direct contact to higher income groups in order to develop small businesses and thus to enable the opportunities of individual advancement. Subsequently, central districts, such as Al Asmakh in Doha, are key urban spaces to establish and nurture both social and spatial justice. It is hoped that the parts of old Doha which remain, such as the neighbourhoods of Al-Asmakh and Al-Najada which accommodate low-income groups, particularly labourers, are also treated as important place typologies that shaped the memory and history of the city. While demolition and eviction notices have been issued for around half the buildings in the Al-Asmakh area, recent professional and academic debates may offer possibilities for fulfilling this hope (Salama 2014b). Future aspirational change in Doha’s old centre could then be based not only on top-down decisions but also via initiatives generated by interest groups or the local community, employing bottom-up strategies.
AS conceived of the study, participated in developing and validating the methodology, and delivered and supervised the application of the experimental design. He also contributed to drafting, reviewing, and editing the manuscript. SA contributed to the literature review, participated in the development of the research tools and supervised the implementation process. FW participated in the development of the paper and in writing analytical descriptions about the research outcomes. He also offered analytical reflections on drawing conclusions and in establishing future projections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Key components of this paper are developed based on an earlier comprehensive funded research project of the National Priorities Research Program, QNRF-Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP 09-1083-6–023). Thanks are due to the class groups of ARCT 420: Environment-Behaviour Studies, delivered as part of the professional five year program in architecture, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar University. In particular we acknowledge the work of Al Amira Ebtissam Al Bash, Areej Radwan, Hadeel Saleh, Heba El-Gahani, Kholoud Soliman, Sania Fatima, Sara Abdulrahman. The authors acknowledge the resources offered through the leadership fund of the Department of Architecture at the University of Strathclyde toward developing this work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Al Buainain FA (1999) Urbanisation in Qatar: A study of the residential and commercial land development in Doha city, 1970–1997. University of Salford Press, SalfordGoogle Scholar
- Altman I (1975) The environment and social behavior. Brookes/Cole, MontereyGoogle Scholar
- Burgess EW (1925) The growth of the city. In: Park RE, Burgess EW, McKenzie RD (eds) The city: suggestions of investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 47–62Google Scholar
- Chase J, Crawford M, Kaliski J (1999) Everyday urbanism. The Monacelli Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Colliers international (2014) Doha’s residential market http://www.colliers.com/-/media/562F03BEE6D54CA0B7BA140DF287C911.ashx?la=en-GB Accessed 10 Oct 2016
- Edwards S, Charley J (2011) Writing the modern city: Literature, architecture, modernity. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Elsheshtawy Y (2013) Where the sidewalk ends: informal street corner encounters in Dubai. Cities 31:382–393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evren Tok M, Alkhater LRM, Pal LA (eds) (2016) Policy-making in a transformative state: the case of Qatar. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fainstein S (2005) Cities and diversity: should we want it? Should we plan for it? Urban Aff Rev 42(1):3–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fox J, Sabbah N, Al-Mutawa M (eds) (2006) Globalization and the Gulf. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fromherz A (2012) Qatar: a modern history. I B Tauris, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gardner A (2011) Gulf migration and the family. J Arab Stud 1(1):3–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gardner A, Pessoa S, Diop A, Al-Ghanim K, Trung K, Harkness L (2013) A Portrait of Low Income Migrants in Contemporary Qatar. J Arab Stud 3(1):1–17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gardner A, Pessoa S, Harkness L (2014) Labour migrants and access to justice in contemporary Qatar. http://www.lse.ac.uk/middleEastCentre/publications/Reports/LabourMigrantsQatarEnglish.pdf Accessed 18 Nov 2016
- Gehl J (1987) Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Goonewardena K, Kipfer S, Milgrom R, Schmid C (2008) Space, difference, everyday life: reading Henri Lefebvre. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- GSDP (2009) Advancing sustainable development, Qatar’s second human development report. General Secretariat of Development Planning. Gulf Publishing and Printing Company, DohaGoogle Scholar
- Harrison F (2007) Where is the urban design discourse? Places 19(3):61–63Google Scholar
- Harvey D (2010) Social justice and the city. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
- Hasanin A (2007) Urban legibility and shaping the image of Doha. Archnet-IJAR: Int J Arch Res 1(3):37–54Google Scholar
- Human Rights Watch (2012) Building a Better World Cup. Protecting Migrant Workers in Qatar Ahead of FIFA 2022. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/qatar0612webwcover_0.pdf Accessed 18 Nov 2016
- Jones P, Roberts M, Morris L (2007) Rediscovering mixed-use streets: the contribution of local high streets to sustainable communities. Policy Press in association with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, BristolGoogle Scholar
- Kamrava M (ed) (2016) Gateways to the world: Port cities in the Persian Gulf. Hurst Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kelbaugh D (2000) Three paradigms: new urbanism, everyday urbanism, post urbanism: an excerpt from the essential common place. Bull Sci Technol Soc 20(August):285–289View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Law R (2014) The paradox of Msheireb. Urban Pamphleteer 4:8–9Google Scholar
- Law R, Underwood L (2012) Msheireb heart of Doha: an alternative approach to urbanism in the Gulf region. Int J Islam Arch 1(1):131–147Google Scholar
- Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- MDPS (2015) Census 2015. Ministry of development planning and statistics. http://www.mdps.gov.qa/en/knowledge/Publications/Other/Census%202015.pdf Accessed 15 Sept 2016
- Mitchell D (1996) Introduction: public space and the city. Urban Geogr 17(2):127–131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MMAA (1986) Dar Al Handaseh consultants: Doha inner city redevelopment, Draft Report No. 1- evaluation and review. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Agriculture, DohaGoogle Scholar
- Mohamad R, Sidaway J (2012) Spectacular urbanization amidst variegated geographies of globalization: learning from Abu Dhabi’s trajectory through the lives of South Asian men. Int J Urban Reg Res 36(3):606–627View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagy S (1997) Social and spatial process: an ethnographic study of housing in Qatar. University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Nagy S (2000) Dressing up downtown: Urban development and government public image in Qatar. City Soc 12(1):125–147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagy S (2006) Making room for migrants, making sense of difference: spatial and ideological expression of social diversity in urban Qatar. Urban Stud 43(1):119–137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Purcell M (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58(2002):99–108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport A (1990) The meaning of the built environment: a non-verbal communication approach. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport A (2005) Culture, architecture, and design. Locke Science Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Remali AM, Salama AM, Wiedmann F, Ibrahim HG (2016) A chronological exploration of the evolution of housing typologies in Gulf cities. City T Arch 3(1):1–15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salama AM (2014a) Interrogating the practice of image making in a budding context. Archnet-IJAR: Int J Arch Res 8(3):74–94Google Scholar
- Salama AM (2014b) Intervention urbanism: the delicacy of aspirational change in the old center of Doha. Urban Pamphleteer 4:1–3Google Scholar
- Salama AM (2015) Urban traditions in the contemporary lived space of cities on the Arabian Peninsula. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 27(1):21–39Google Scholar
- Salama AM, Azzali S (2015) Examining attributes of urban open spaces in Doha. ICE - Urban Design and Planning 168(2):75–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salama AM, Wiedmann F (2013) Demystifying Doha: On architecture and urbanism in an emerging city. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Salama AM, Wiedmann F (2016) Perceiving Urban Livability in an Emerging Migrant City. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Urban Design and Planning 169 (6): 268-278Google Scholar
- Salama AM, Al-Maimani A, Khalfani F (2013a) b) Understanding inhabitants’ spatial experience of the city of Doha through cognitive mapping. Open House, International 38(4):37–46Google Scholar
- Salama AM, Khalfani F, Al-Maimani A (2013b) a) Experiential assessment of urban open spaces in Doha. Open House, International 38(4):47–57Google Scholar
- Samahy R, Hutzell K (2014) In search of Doha’s public realm. Urban Pamphleteer 4:10–13Google Scholar
- Sanderock L (1998) Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Sanoff H (1974) Measuring attributes of the visual environment. In: Lang JT, Burnette C, Moleski W, Vachon D (eds) Designing for human behavior: architecture and the behavioral sciences. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, pp 244–260Google Scholar
- Sanoff H (1991) Visual research methods in design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sanoff H (2000) Community participation methods in design and planning. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Sulayman K (2010) Dubai camel market transnational workers: an ethnographic portrait. City Soc 22(1):97–118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whyte WH (1980) The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces Inc, WahsingtonGoogle Scholar
- Wiedmann F, Salama AM, Mirincheva V (2013) Urban reconfiguration and revitalization: public mega projects in Doha’s historic center. Open House Int 38(4):27–36Google Scholar