An interdisciplinary debate on project perspectives
Table 2 Number of mouzas with percentage of area and population under different level of agricultural development in 2014.
Level of development | Number of mouzas | Name of mouzas | % of total population | % of total area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Agricultural level of development | ||||
High | 12 | Rajbandh, Ahammadpur, Bagpi Chula, Dudiabandi, Ghosh Khira, Gobardda, Amla Bani, Asta Kola, Putigerya, Kharpuri, Kontai, Maheswaripur | 17.46 | 16.92 |
High middle | 33 | Tyangrasol, Shal Dahara, Dakshinsol, Mahishlot, Kadalawa, Brindabanpur, Nadarya, Saiyadpur, Gakulpur, Lengtisol, Saraswatipur, Ashnabani, Madhupur, Krishnapur, Dhansol, Dubrajpur, Talchhara, Betbani Radha Khauki, Raghunath Chak, Banshkona, Pirrakuli, Palaibani, Karamsol, Baragada, Bagbasa, Nutandihi, Srikrishnapur, Sarasbedya, Sundra, Sitanathpur, Ramraydi, Gaighata, Shalika | 34.46 | 37.41 |
Low middle | 31 | Metal, Sitarampur, Khas Jangal, Kalabere, Katalkuli, Juyalbhanga, Bhangaband, Tung Ni, Bhad Kuri, Biridanga, Kali Nagar, Pukhur Kona, Ramakata, Durgadaspur, Parasia, Masru, Pachashamar, Sundarpur, Benachapra, Shyamchandpur, Jagyeswarpur, Nitaipur, Banshkopna, Chantibandh, Ashna Shuli, Jamdedya, Kulpheni, Hatmari, Kharka Suli, Arabari, Barju | 30.08 | 39.38 |
Low | 14 | Kalichak, Godapiasol, Jorakusumi, Benagere, Chensol, Jhar Bhanga, Pachakua, Kharga Diha, Arabari, Jaynarayanpur, Danmari, Bhalukmari, Khairisol, Ghagrasol | 17.99 | 6.29 |