Natural ventilation as a passive cooling strategy for multi-story buildings: analytic vertical skycourt formations
City, Territory and Architecture volume 10, Article number: 28 (2023)
Natural ventilation has been one of the most important passive cooling strategies for conditioning the built environment. However, several challenges influence natural ventilation in multi-story buildings. Consequently, skycourt presents a passive cooling strategy to provide a direct airflow into the space to cool the surroundings, increase thermal comfort, and reduce the need for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, this study proposes utilizing the skycourt as a passive cooling strategy that helps to enhance natural ventilation in multi-story buildings. The aim of the research is achieved by analyzing various global examples of buildings, based on the skycourt, in different climatic zones; dry, tropical, temperate, and cold. These examples covered all classifications of multi-story buildings (e.g., mid-rise, high-rise, and skyscrapers). Through this analysis, the influence of skycourt in providing natural ventilation is determined, which contributes to reduce energy consumption. Finally, a reference matrix for designers and decision-makers in the four studied climatic zones can be conducted to promote natural ventilation using the skycourt strategy.
Improving natural ventilation contributes to the reduction of energy consumption in multi-story buildings.
Skycourts have a significant impact on enhancing natural ventilation in buildings.
The role of the skycourt in natural ventilation was verified by comparing international examples.
Buildings contribute in a significant proportion to total energy consumption and emit a large proportion of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide (Abo EL Einen et al. 2019; Nejat et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2022; Hassan et al. 2022; Shehata et al. 2022). Even if the proportions vary by country, the construction sector is responsible for approximately 30–40% of the total energy demand (Noaman et al. 2022; Abd Elraouf et al. 2022). About 40% of total building energy worldwide is consumed for heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems in the residential and commercial sectors (Elmokadem et al. 2016; Shahda and Megahed 2022; Hassan and Megahed 2022), which caused serious environmental problems. Thus, developing passive cooling strategies that reduce energy consumption, support the environment and the ecosystem, and provide a satisfactory degree of comfort presents an essential and critical need at this time (Shahda 2018; Elmokadem et al. 2019).
Passive cooling is based on the transfer of energy from one space to another to reach a temperature lower than the surrounding environment (Geetha and Velraj 2012; Parys et al. 2012). Preventing heat from entering the building is the basic cooling principle of the passive cooling concept (Song et al. 2021; Elzeni et al. 2021). As shown in Fig. 1, passive cooling emphasizes three main strategies: heat prevention (reducing heat absorption), heat modulation (modifying heat gain), and heat dissipation (removing endogenous heat) (Song et al. 2021; Shahda et al. 2018; Mohammad Alinezhad 2019).
As shown in Fig. 1, natural ventilation is a passive cooling strategy that disperses heat and facilitates thermal comfort and a comfortable indoor environment, contributing to energy consumption saving (Seidabadi et al. 2019; Yao et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2019; Pan et al. 2019). The building form is a passive design strategy that prevents heat transfer. One of the most important forms of building in architecture in all climatic regions is the courtyard (Aldawoud and Clark 2008; Safarzadeh and Bahadori 2005). In this paper, “courtyard” refers to any open space surrounded by walls or buildings (Abo EL Einen et al. 2019). Courtyards present thermal barriers against the external climate because they reduce energy losses from surfaces in contact with the outside air and contribute to providing natural ventilation for internal spaces, which reduces energy consumption (Abo EL Einen et al. 2019; Taleghani et al. 2012, 2014).
Driven by the spread of multi-story buildings promoted by economic development, designers developed the traditional courtyard into an atrium (Muhaisen 2006; Meir et al. 1995). Atriums are spaces surrounded by walls but differ from courtyards in that atriums are covered with glass. Similar to courtyards, atriums provide significant benefits from natural ventilation (Zhao et al. 2022; Acred and Hunt 2014). The courtyard and the atrium were then designed to extend into the vertical plane of the multi-story buildings' facades creating the skycourt (Priyadarsini et al. 2004; Moosavi et al. 2015).
Skycourts are a contemporary alternative to courtyards for multi-story buildings. Skycourt allows natural light to penetrate deeper into interior spaces, enhancing ventilation while avoiding unwanted solar energy gain, and significantly reducing energy consumption, besides many benefits from a social and economic perspective (Yeang 1999).
The research aims to highlight the role of the skycourt in providing natural ventilation for multi-story buildings, which presents a significant gap in the literature through the following sections. A theoretical background on the skycourt and its role as a passive design strategy is discussed in the first section. In the second section, natural ventilation and its role as a passive design strategy are highlighted. Then, in the third and fourth sections, various global examples of buildings, based on the skycourts, in different climatic zones are analyzed and explained to identify their role in providing natural ventilation in four climatic regions, namely dry, tropical, temperate, and cold, for all types of multi-story buildings, mid-rise, high-rise, and skyscrapers. Then, the reference matrix is conducted to determine the interrelationship between; a) the skycourt as a passive cooling strategy and the four main types of climates, and b) the multi-story building types. Finally, the final section presents the conclusion of this study.
Skycourts as a passive cooling strategy
Skycourts are increasingly included in multi-story buildings. Skycourts spaces serve as spaces for transition nodes and social gatherings, besides their environmental and economic benefits (Alnusairat 2018). This section aims to discuss the role of skycourt as a passive cooling strategy in multi-story buildings.
Development of the skycourt
The skycourt was developed from the principles of courts and atriums to enhance ventilation and capture daylight (Alnusairat 2018). Skycourts were featured in multi-story buildings between 1890 and 1930 as void layouts within U-, H-, E-, and O-shaped building plans. After the invention of air conditioning, the construction of multi-story buildings based on mechanical systems for air conditioning increased. However, after the oil crisis in 1973, new strategies emerged to reduce energy consumption for heating, ventilation, cooling, and lighting (Noaman et al. 2022; Shahda and Megahed 2022; Nashaat et al. 2022; Ismail et al. 2022, 2023; Elgheznawy et al. 2022). Thus, skycourts, as one of these environmental strategies, have been reintroduced to facilitate occupant interaction, provide daylight, and promote natural ventilation (Linden 1999; Al-Kodmany 2015).
Configurations of skycourts in multi-story buildings
As shown in Fig. 2, courts can be located in the lower part of the multi-story building as a skyentrance, between the middle floors as a skycourt or skygarden, or at the top of the building as a skyroof (Alnusairat 2018). These empty spaces can be two or more stories high, connected to the interior and exterior surrounding areas by open or closed walls (Pomeroy 2008).
Figure 3 shows an example of the spatial configuration of a skycourt categorized into six archetypes; (a) hollow space, the skycourt is connected to the outside air by only one edge, and the remaining walls are attached to the building edges, (b) corner space, the skycourt is connected to the outside air through two walls and the other two edges connected to the building, (c) lateral space, the skycourt is also connected to the outside air through two walls and the other two walls connected to the building, but the proportion of the skycourt is more elongated than the corner space model, (d) interstitial space, the building is in the middle of the skycourt area, (e) chimney, this case is the opposite of case d because the skycourt is in the middle of the building, known as the courtyard, and (f) filling space, also the skycourt in the middle of the building, but it spans the entire width of the building (Alnusairat 2018; Pomeroy 2008, 2013; Rabbat 2017).
Fundamental benefits of skycourts in multi-story buildings
Skycourt spaces have many benefits that make them one of the most important passive design strategies in this era. Their primary function is to serve as public and social spaces for multi-story buildings (Alnusairat 2018). These spaces are also used as transitional and heat-insulating zones and contribute to providing natural lighting and natural ventilation in the adjacent interior spaces, which helps to reduce the use of mechanical devices for lighting and ventilation, hence saving energy consumption, in addition to the benefits of skycourt from an environmental, social and economic perspective (Alnusairat 2018; Pomeroy 2008). Table 1 illustrates the benefits of skycourt spaces in multi-story buildings from an environmental, social, and economic perspective (Pomeroy 2013; Jahnkassim and Ip 1988; Kuo et al. 1998; Bay 2004; Clements-Croome and Baizhan 2000).
Based on Table 1, this study emphasizes the analysis of global examples of skycourts in the context of the passive cooling design strategy, whereas skycourts act as a transitional space between the building spaces, in addition to an environmental filter that contributes to enhancing the natural ventilation and natural lighting of the building spaces. Moreover, it acts as an acoustic and thermal insulator, besides its role in enhancing social interactions and well-being, and this helps in improving productivity.
Natural ventilation of skycourt as a passive cooling strategy
Natural ventilation is one of the most effective passive cooling strategies and can provide building occupants with comfortable thermal conditions and a healthy indoor environment (Liping and Hien 2007; Awada et al. 2021; Hassan et al. 2020a). However, multi-story buildings are based on mechanical ventilation systems (Núñez and García 2022) instead of natural ventilation due to several challenges (Zhong et al. 2022), which influence energy consumption. Therefore, buildings, especially multi-story buildings, can become self-sufficient by returning to nature, avoiding negative impacts on the environment, and promoting natural ventilation in those buildings (Etheridge 2011; Hassan et al. 2020b).
Natural ventilation in buildings has three basic principles; single-sided ventilation, cross-ventilation, and stack-ventilation, which are applied in courtyards and skycourts (Aflaki et al. 2015; Walker 2010). In single-sided ventilation, fresh air enters the room, and used air is exhausted from the same side. In cross-ventilation, fresh air enters the room from one side and exits on the other through windows or openings built into the facades. In stack ventilation, fresh air enters through the lower-level openings and used and polluted air is discharged through the higher-level openings (Shirzadi et al. 2018; Ohba and Lun 2010; Wang et al. 2018). The strategy for natural ventilation in skycourts is based on cross and stack ventilation (Shirzadi et al. 2018; Ohba and Lun 2010; Wang et al. 2018).
Mixed ventilation refers to a hybrid approach to space conditioning that uses a combination of natural ventilation and mechanical systems that include air distribution equipment and refrigeration equipment for cooling. A well-designed mixed building begins with enhancing the role of natural ventilation by using passive design strategies to reduce cooling loads. It then incorporates the use of air conditioning when and where necessary, with the use of natural ventilation whenever possible or desirable, to maximize comfort while avoiding the significant energy use and operating costs of year-round air conditioning (Kim and Dear 2021; Ezzeldin and Rees 2013; Salcido et al. 2016).
This research aims to analyze the role of skycourt as a passive cooling design strategy that affects the performance of natural ventilation in multi-story buildings. We achieve this objective by analyzing global examples of skycourts. First, we collected many examples of skycourts from different climatic regions and then applied the criteria described in this section to limit the number for analysis. Next, basic information about the skycourts and the providing natural ventilation in such buildings, their role in reducing energy consumption, and the standards of the design of the skycourt were identified. Finally, we summarized the results to develop guidance design criteria for architects and designers in the implementation of skycourts in four climatic regions: dry, tropical, temperate, and cold. Therefore, this paper emphasizes the effective aspects and their approximate weight to highlight the essential aspects of designing skycourts to provide natural ventilation and contribute to reducing energy consumption (Fig. 4).
Global examples of skycourts
Based on this section, an analytical study of our samples, namely, skycourt in buildings located in different climates is conducted. This analysis helped us to determine the existing patterns and spatial configurations of skycourt spaces that serve as transitional buffer spaces in multi-story buildings and contribute to providing natural ventilation of spaces for skycourts and their surrounding spaces.
In the first stage of the analytical approach, we collected general information on our sample of buildings with skycourts. The buildings were designed in different years and located in different climate zones; dry, tropical, temperate, and cold. We selected buildings with diverse functions that were not limited to a specific function. The two criteria for buildings were a skycourt that serves neighborhood residents and classification as a multi-story building.
First, we performed a comprehensive qualitative analysis of many (> 30) buildings in different climatic zones. To achieve this objective, we classified each building by function, building orientation, year of construction, climatic region, height, and skycourt type. Based on the comprehensive qualitative analysis, 13 buildings were selected for a detailed quantitative study to collect accurate information on skycourts and this architectural feature’s environmental role in providing natural ventilation within those spaces and the surrounding architectural spaces. Building selection was such that there was diversity in the climatic zones and height of the buildings. The objective of this step was to understand the building standards for each climate and each building classification: mid-rise, high-rise, and skyscraper.
The examples were classified according to the number of floors of the mid-rise buildings, high-rise buildings, and skyscrapers: mid-rise buildings, 2–6 floors; high-rise buildings, 7–40 floors; and skyscrapers, more than 40 floors (Kovacevic and Dzidic 2018). Table 2 shows the main information collected on the four mid-rise buildings under analysis: the Masdar Institute, the Business Promotion Center, Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings, and The Courtyard House.
Table 3 shows the basic information collected on the five high-rise buildings under analysis: Phinisi Tower, Torre Cube, Century Tower, GSW Headquarters, and 1 Bligh Street.
Table 4 shows the basic information collected on the four skyscrapers under analysis: Al Faisaliah Center, Swiss Re Tower, Commerzbank Headquarters, and The Shard London Bridge Tower.
As shown in Table 2–4, all buildings depend on natural ventilation. The natural ventilation patterns in the buildings varied between stack and cross ventilation. The buildings depended on natural ventilation in different proportions, and the percentage of dependence of some buildings using natural ventilation reached 100%, such as the Masdar Institute, the Business Promotion Center, Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings, Torre Cube, 1 Bligh Street, and Al Faisaliah Center, and the percentages varied in the remaining buildings: The Courtyard House (95%), Phinisi Tower (60%), Century Tower (65%), GSW Headquarters (30–40%), 1 Bligh Street (63%), Swiss Re Tower (40%), Commerzbank Headquarters (85%), and The Shard (London Bridge Tower; 25%). In addition, most buildings provided night ventilation.
Skycourt configurations have contributed to reducing energy consumption by significant proportions. We did not reach the actual consumption of energy for some buildings. As for the buildings whose annual energy consumption has been reached, we notice a significant saving in energy consumption rates. Annual consumption in the Business Promotion Center was 13 kWh/m2; Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Building, 125 kWh/m2; Century Tower, 26 kWh/m2; Commerzbank Headquarters, 117 kWh/m2; and The Shard (London Bridge Tower), 54 kWh/m2. For the remaining buildings, specific information on annual energy consumption was not found.
Skycourt attributes in selected buildings
The skycourt in the multi-story buildings of all building classifications; mid-rise, high-rise, and skyscraper had similar functions and spatial configurations in all specified climatic regions zones; dry, tropical, temperate, and cold. However, we observed differences in the façade envelope, such as the percentage of opening in the skycourt wall and shading. We found other differences in the selected examples, such as the skycourt type, the skycourts’ environmental functions, and the skycourts’ morphological composition. Tables 5, 6, 7 show the skycourt attributes in mid-rise buildings, high-rise buildings, and skyscrapers, respectively.
As shown in Tables 5, 6, 7, the skycourt and skygarden are the most observed types in mid-rise buildings, such as the Masdar Institute, Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings, and The Courtyard House. For high-rise buildings, skycourts on typical floors and skycourts on final floors are the most observed types, and the skyroof is used as a restaurant, such as at Century Tower and 1 Bligh Street. For skyscrapers, the use of the skycourt on typical floors and the skyentrance on the first floor are merged, such as et al. Faisaliah Center and The Shard (London Bridge Tower).
In hot and cold climates, open skycourt walls were uncommon. By contrast, they were glazed and closed owing to the high wind speed and temperature variation between summer and winter and day and night. In addition, shading is required to reduce solar radiation in summer and allow it in winter. In humid climates, the skyentrance is widely used because it helps reduce humidity on upper floors, such as those of Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings, Phinisi Tower, and 1 Bligh Street.
A skycourt located between the floors of a building was the most observed type, followed by a skyroof and skyentrance. A skygarden was commonly observed in residential models. Skycourts were mostly located between the office areas and the exterior walls.
Skycourt location is associated with its functionality. For instance, a skycourt between the floors of the building was the most observed type in high-rise buildings, followed by a skygarden and skyentrance. A skygarden was commonly observed in mid-rise buildings, followed by a skyroof, skycourt, and skyentrace. In skyscrapers, the most observed type is a skyroof, followed by a skycourt and skygarden.
Additionally, a hollowed-out design was the most observed prototype for skycourts in mid-rise buildings and high-rise buildings. This buffer zone is attached to the outside by one edge. Other commonly observed prototypes in mid-rise buildings and skyscrapers were corner and three-edged (sided) shapes.
In mid-rise buildings, for example, Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings, the skycourt helped to achieve all the functions of the skycourt specified in the research. In Masdar City and Business Promotion Center, the skycourt fulfilled four of the specified functions. In high-rise buildings, the skycourt was widely used as a social space, transitional space, and passive design element. By contrast, in skyscrapers, the skycourt was used as a social space and passive design element, such as those in Swiss Re Tower, Commerzbank Headquarters, and The Shard (London Bridge Tower).
In mid-rise buildings and skygarden and skycourt acted as a buffer zone, capturing cold air from the interior, and exhaling hot air. In high-rise buildings, the skycourt was mostly used to capture cold air and expel hot air from another place. The role of other environmental functions of skycourts in mid-rise buildings, high-rise buildings, and skyscrapers was providing natural lighting for the surrounding spaces and inside the skycourt and a thermal buffer zone. In cold and hot climates, the thermal buffer zone helps reduce heat transfer from inside to outside and from outside to inside.
In this section, the results of the examples are presented and analyzed in terms of the role of the skycourt in promoting natural ventilation and reducing energy consumption, followed by a discussion of these results to determine the role of skycourts as transitional spaces that contribute to providing natural ventilation.
Results of examples analysis
The results of the analysis of the 13 examples of multi-story buildings indicated that all buildings enhance natural ventilation, and this facilitated high rates of energy consumption reduction, which reached 100% in several buildings. The skycourt also enhanced night ventilation. Notably, all types of ventilation were either cross-ventilation or stack ventilation patterns because the type of ventilation in skycourts is either cross or stack and does not depend on single ventilation.
The results also indicate the difference in the type of skycourt in the buildings and the diversity of the spatial morphology of the skycourt. In the mid-rise buildings, the most used type of skycourt was the skycourt and skygarden. In the high-rise buildings, most of the four types of skycourt buildings were used. In skyscrapers, the most used type was the skyroof, followed by the skycourt and the skygarden.
Regarding the spatial morphology of the skycourt types, they varied in each type of building. In mid-rise and high-rise buildings, hollow space, interstitial space, and chimney space were the most used formations. In skyscrapers buildings, hollow spaces, and corner spaces were the most used formations.
The results also indicate the high effect of the skycourt types on enhancing the natural ventilation of multi-story buildings, which contributed to reducing energy consumption. In mid-rise buildings, the dependence on natural ventilation reached 100%, such as that for the Masdar Institute, the Business Promotion Center, and Dongguan's Eco-Park Office Buildings; in reducing energy consumption at high rates, reaching 100% in the Masdar Institute; and in the remaining buildings, the percentage of exceeded 50%. Regarding high-rise buildings, they depended on natural ventilation at rates that reached 100% for Torre Cube and 1 Bligh Street, a city building’s adoption of 100% natural ventilation reduced energy consumption by 100%, and the percentage of energy savings of Century Tower reached 75%.
Promoting passive strategies matrix
Based on the analysis of the skycourt as a passive cooling design strategy via various global examples in different climates, this section proposes the reference matrix. Designers and decision-makers can refer to this matrix in designing the facades of multi-story buildings to enhance their natural ventilation, which is beneficial in reducing energy consumption. This matrix mainly constitutes the interrelationship in the design of the skycourt as a passive cooling design strategy, on the horizontal axis, and the vertical axis determines the classifications of the 13 multi-story buildings; mid-rise, high-rise, and skyscrapers, in our sample in each of the four main climate zones; dry, tropical, temperate, and cold. Some relationships are strong, and others are weak. In Table 8, these relationships are shown in different colors. The relationship strength varied between weak, medium, and strong relationships.
As shown in Table 8, the standards and criteria for the design of skycourts vary significantly by building height classification and the local climate. For the hot climate, in all building classifications, the most used type was the skycourt, followed by the skygarden and skyroof; the least used type was the skyentrance. For the tropical climate, the two most used types were the skyroof and the skygarden, and the use of the skycourt and the skyentrance were the same. For the temperate climate, the most used type was the skygarden, followed by the skyroof and the skycourt; the skyentrance was not used. For the cold climate, for high-rise buildings and skyscrapers, the most used type was the skycourt, followed by the skyentrance.
Regarding spatial morphology, in all climates, the most used forms were hollow space, followed by interstitial space; the least used formations were corner space, lateral space, and chimney space. Filling space was not observed. Considering the benefits provided by the types of skycourts in the examples, the skycourt in all the buildings helped provide natural ventilation. The skycourt provided other benefits in different proportions. This finding helped us achieve the main objective of the research, determining the role of the skycourt in promoting natural ventilation and contributing to reducing energy consumption.
Concerning the importance of passive design strategies in reducing energy consumption and preserving the environment, the effect of skycourt spaces in multi-story buildings and the environmental effects, especially in enhancing natural ventilation, is discussed in this section.
The types of court spaces in the facades, especially the skycourt, which is located between the typical floors in multi-story buildings, provide many benefits for the building from an environmental, social, and economic perspective. The research emphasized the environmental aspect, especially natural ventilation. In several examples, natural ventilation reached 100%, which led to a high reduction in energy consumption.
The different configurations of the skycourt, especially the hollow space, interstitial space, and chimney, provided natural ventilation for the multi-story buildings, which helps to reduce energy consumption. Such formations also help to provide an external social space that increases well-being and serves as a transitional space, ecological filter, biodiversity enhancer, and productivity enhancer. Skycourt spaces provide many benefits other than the role of enhancing natural ventilation in most buildings. They serve as a transitional space that contributes to social interaction and well-being, improves productivity, provides natural lighting, and acts as an environmental filter and a sound and heat insulator.
In this study, the effect of the skycourt configurations in the existing multi-story buildings was examined. Furthermore, a limited number of configurations were selected in the sample of buildings; thus, in further research, additional test cases can be developed according to real microclimate conditions. In addition, the limitations regarding the small sample size cannot be generalized to all skycourt architectural configurations. However, such results are influential in the development of skycourt configurations to allow for outdoor social contact and enhance the natural ventilation of buildings, reducing energy consumption.
These findings help to clarify the impact of the skycourt as a passive cooling strategy for natural ventilation in multi-story buildings. These results can be used to help provide an improved design for skycourt spaces, allowing for improvements in ventilation, the comfort of interior environments, and occupant satisfaction. Improving the design of the skycourt space can provide social, psychological, economic, and quality of life benefits.
Multi-story buildings present a challenge regarding high energy consumption owing to the extensive use of air conditioning systems to provide thermal comfort to occupants. Skycourts are increasingly becoming integrated into the design of multi-story buildings to generate a more comfortable and livable environment than without them. These spaces act as transition nodes and spaces for social interaction. The literature indicates that skycourts could play a promising role in enhancing natural ventilation, which helps to reduce the energy consumption of buildings. However, few studies have provided evidence of their effect on total natural ventilation and the amount of cooling energy they provide in buildings.
This research contributes to proving the role of skycourts in enhancing the natural ventilation of multi-story buildings, in addition to achieving an acceptable level of thermal comfort in these spaces. The positive effect of skycourts on multi-story buildings in all climates was confirmed. Common skycourt prototypes have been identified as transitional buffer spaces in multi-story buildings; (a) hollow space, (b) lateral space, (c) corner. We observed that ventilation has a significant impact on indoor thermal conditions and energy consumption. However, a satisfactory indoor environment can be achieved not by introducing extravagant concepts but by developing a balanced approach to identifying ventilation needs and applying the tools to manage these requirements. This study contributes to literature by providing new insights into low-energy designs with a focus on ventilation. One of the main objectives of the study was to outline design guidelines for multi-story buildings in four climates to ensure maximum utilization of natural ventilation. The study succeeded in achieving this goal by creating a skycourt design and performance matrix. These results allow designers and decision-makers to decide on the appropriate prototype and geometrical properties of skycourt spaces.
Further research should emphasize detailed analyses of the role of the skycourt in allowing daylight to penetrate and prevent direct solar heat gain and consider the potential of these spaces to improve daylight and reduce glare. Also, it may be important for future studies to complement what this study raised and find a possible combination of daylight and heating and cooling demand for buildings with large voids. Concerning the social and environmental aspects of the skycourt, it needs many studies and experiments to reach the extent of the impact of the skycourt on it. Plants can be a primary characteristic of skycourts in multi-story buildings because plants can improve the environmental performance of skycourts, the well-being of their occupants, the thermal comfort of buildings, and urban scales. Therefore, further research investigating the effect of green space incorporation on skycourt performance would be worthwhile.
Availability of data and materials
All data sources are cited within the text.
Abass F, Ismail LH, Solla M (2016) A review of courtyard house: history evolution forms, and functions. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11:2557–2563
Abd Elraouf R, Elmokadem A, Megahed N, Eleinen O, Eltarabily S (2022) Evaluating urban outdoor thermal comfort: a validation of ENVI-met simulation through field measurement. J Build Perform Simul 15:268–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2046165
Abo EL Einen O, Shahda MM, Rasha A (2019) Effect of mass formation on indoor thermal performance in the Arab Region, Port-Said Eng. Res J 23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2160/pserj.2019.32530
Acred A, Hunt GR (2014) Stack ventilation in multi-storey atrium buildings: a dimensionless design approach. Build Environ 72:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.007
Aflaki A, Mahyuddin N, Mahmoud ZA-C, Baharum MR (2015) A review on natural ventilation applications through building façade components and ventilation openings in tropical climates. Energy Build 101:153–162
Aldawoud A, Clark R (2008) Comparative analysis of energy performance between courtyard and atrium in buildings. Energy Build 40:209–214
Al-Kodmany K (2015) Eco-towers: Sustainable cities in the sky. WIT Press, Billerica
Alnusairat S (2018) Approaches to skycourt design and performance in high-rise office buildings in a temperate climate. Cardiff University, Cardiff
Alsheghri A, Sharief SA, Rabbani S, Aitzhan NZ (2015) Design and cost analysis of a solar photovoltaic powered reverse osmosis plant for Masdar Institute. Energy Procedia 75:319–324
S. Altomonte, Daylight and the Occupant, in: Vis. Physio-Psychological Well-Being Built Environ. PLEA, Quebec City, Canada, 2009: pp. 22–24.
Awada M, Becerik-Gerber B, Hoque S, O’Neill Z, Pedrielli G, Wen J, Wu T (2021) Ten questions concerning occupant health in buildings during normal operations and extreme events including the COVID-19 pandemic. Build Environ 188:107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107480
Bai G, Gong G, Yu CW, Zhen O (2015) A combined, large, multi-faceted bulbous façade glazed curtain with open atrium as a natural ventilation solution for an energy efficient sustainable office building in Southern China. Indoor Built Environ 24:813–832
Bay J (2004) Sustainable community and environment in tropical Singapore high-rise housing: the case of Bedok Court condominium. Archit Res Q 8:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135913550400034X
Burghardt KT, Tallamy DW, Gregory Shriver W (2009) Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conserv Biol 23:219–224
Cantón MA, Ganem C, Barea G, Llano JF (2014) Courtyards as a passive strategy in semi dry areas. Assessment of summer energy and thermal conditions in a refurbished school building. Renew Energy 69:437–446
Castleton HF, Stovin V, Beck SBM, Davison JB (2010) Green roofs; building energy savings and the potential for retrofit. Energy Build 42:1582–1591
Chen Y, Tong Z, Wu W, Samuelson H, Malkawi A, Norford L (2019) Achieving natural ventilation potential in practice: control schemes and levels of automation. Appl Energy 235:1141–1152
D. Clements-Croome, L. Baizhan, (2000). Productivity and indoor environment, in: Proc. Heal. Build. pp. 629–634.
Elgheznawy D, Enein O, Shalaby G, Seif A (2022) An experimental study of indoor air quality enhancement using breathing walls. Civ Eng Archit 10:194–209. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100117
Elmokadem A, Megahed N, Noaman D (2016) Systematic framework for the efficient integration of wind technologies into buildings. Front Archit Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.12.004
Elmokadem A, Eleinen O, Megahed N, Hassan A (2019) Passive strategies of promoting outdoor air quality in microclimate. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2019.0806070
M. Elzeni, A. Elmokadem, N. Badawy, Classification of Urban Morphology Indicators towards Urban Generation, Port-Said Eng. Res. J. (2021). https://doi.org/10.21608/pserj.2021.91760.1135.
Etheridge D (2011) Natural ventilation of buildings: theory, measurement and design. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Ezzeldin S, Rees SJ (2013) The potential for office buildings with mixed-mode ventilation and low energy cooling systems in arid climates. Energy Build 65:368–381
Geetha NB, Velraj R (2012) Passive cooling methods for energy efficient buildings with and without thermal energy storage–a review, energy educ. Sci Technol Part A Energy Sci Res 29:913–946
Hassan AM, Megahed NA (2022) Urban planning and development improving urban energy resilience with an integrativE. Archit Eng. https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2022-7-4-17-35
Hassan AM, El Mokadem A, Megahed NA, Abo Eleinen OM (2020a) Improving outdoor air quality based on building morphology: numerical investigation. Front. Archit. Res. 9:319–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.01.001
Hassan A, Elmokadem A, Megahed N, Eleinen O (2020b) Urban morphology as a passive strategy in promoting outdoor air quality. J Build Eng 29:101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101204
Hassan SR, Megahed NA, Abo Eleinen OM, Hassan AM (2022) Toward a national life cycle assessment tool: generative design for early decision support. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112144
C Headquarters, R Tower, J Melvin, CL Hall, SJ Center (2007) Innovative Building Skins: Double Glass Wall Ventilated Façade
Ismail R, Megahed N, Eltarabily S (2022) Numerical investigation of the indoor thermal behaviour based on PCMs in a hot climate. Archit Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2022.2058459
Ismail RM, Megahed NA, Eltarabily S (2023) A conceptual framework for phase change material integration in building components. Indoor Built Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X231153924
L.H. Ismail, M. Sibley, I.A. Wahab, (2011). Bioclimatic technology in high rise office building design: a comparison study for indoor environmental condition, J. Sci. Technol
P.S. Jahnkassim, K. Ip, Linking bioclimatic theory and environmental performance in its climatic and cultural context–an analysis into the tropical highrises of Ken Yeang, in: PLEA2006 - 23 Rd Conf. Passiv. Low Energy Archit., Citeseer, Geneva, Switzerland, 1988: p. 9.
N. Jamala. (2017). The effect of building façade on natural lighting (Case study: Building of phinisi tower UNM), in: AIP Conf. Proc., AIP Publishing LLC. p. 20061
Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav 33:507–542
Kim J, de Dear R (2021) Is mixed-mode ventilation a comfortable low-energy solution? A literature review. Build Environ 205:108215
Kim M-J, Yang H-S, Kang J (2014) A case study on controlling sound fields in a courtyard by landscape designs. Landsc Urban Plan 123:10–20
I. Kovacevic, S. Dzidic. 2018. High-Rise Buildings - Structures and Materials, International BURCH University Sarajevo
Kuo M, Sullivan W, Coley R, Brunson L (1998) Fertile ground for community: inner-city neighborhood common spaces. Am J Community Psychol 26:823–851. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022294028903
Lee E, Selkowitz S, Bazjanac V, Inkarojrit V, Kohler C (2002) High-performance commercial building façades. International BURCH University Sarajevo. https://doi.org/10.2172/834266
Linden PF (1999) The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:201–238
Liping W, Hien WN (2007) Applying natural ventilation for thermal comfort in residential buildings in Singapore. Archit Sci Rev 50:224–233
Meir IA, Pearlmutter D, Etzion Y (1995) On the microclimatic behavior of two semi-enclosed attached courtyards in a hot dry region. Build Environ 30:563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(95)00018-2
Miller N, Pogue D, Gough QD, Davis SM (2009) Green buildings and productivity. J Sustain Real Estate 1:65–89
Mohammad Alinezhad F (2019) Passive cooling in shavadoon of traditional buildings of dezful city: cooling through renewable energy sources Iran. J Energy Environ 10:115–120
Moosavi L, Mahyuddin N, Ghafar N (2015) Atrium cooling performance in a low energy office building in the Tropics, a field study. Build Environ 94:384–394
Muhaisen AS (2006) Shading simulation of the courtyard form in different climatic regions. Build Environ 41:1731–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.016
Munro D (2004) Swiss res building. London, Nyheter Stålbyggnad 3:36–43
Nashaat B, Elmokadem A, Waseef A (2022) Evaluating adaptive facade performance in early building design stage: an integrated daylighting simulation and machine learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03918-8_20
Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM, Gohari M, Majid MZA (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:843–862
Noaman D, Moneer SA, Megahed N, El-Ghafour S (2022) Integration of active solar cooling technology into passively designed facade in hot climates. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104658
Núñez A, García AM (2022) Effect of the passive natural ventilation on the bioaerosol in a small room. Build Environ 207:108438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108438
Ohba M, Lun I (2010) Overview of natural cross-ventilation studies and the latest simulation design tools used in building ventilation-related research. Adv Build Energy Res 4:127–166
Pan W, Liu S, Li S, Cheng X, Zhang H, Long Z, Zhang T, Chen Q (2019) A model for calculating single-sided natural ventilation rate in an urban residential apartment. Build Environ 147:372–381
J. Parker. 2013. Engineering The Shard, London: tallest building in western Europe, in: Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng., Thomas Telford Ltd. pp. 66–73
Parys W, Breesch H, Hens H, Saelens D (2012) Feasibility assessment of passive cooling for office buildings in a temperate climate through uncertainty analysis. Build Environ 56:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.018
J. Pomeroy, The sky court: A viable alternative civic space for the 21 st century?, CTBUH J. (2007) 14–19.
J. Pomeroy, Skycourts as transitional space: using space syntax as a predictive theory, in: Congr. Proceedings, Tall Green Typology a Sustain. Urban Futur., 2008.
Pomeroy J (2013). The Skycourt and Skygarden: Greening the Urban Habitat. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881645
Priyadarsini R, Cheong KW, Wong NH (2004) Enhancement of natural ventilation in high-rise residential buildings using stack system. Energy Build 36:61–71
Rabbat N (2017) The courtyard house: from cultural reference to universal relevance. Routledge, Milton Park
B. Raji, M.J. Tenpierik, A. Van den Dobbelsteen, A comparative study of design strategies for energy efficiency in 6 high-rise buildings in two different climates, in: PLEA 2014 Proc. 30th Int. PLEA Conf. Ahmedabad, India, 16–18 December 2014, 2014
Safarzadeh H, Bahadori MN (2005) Passive cooling effects of courtyards. Build Environ 40:89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.04.014
Salcido JC, Raheem AA, Issa RRA (2016) From simulation to monitoring: Evaluating the potential of mixed-mode ventilation (MMV) systems for integrating natural ventilation in office buildings through a comprehensive literature review. Energy Build 127:1008–1018
Seidabadi L, Ghadamian H, Aminy M (2019) A novel integration of PCM with wind-catcher skin material in order to increase heat transfer rate. Int J Renew Energy Dev 8:1–6
Shahda M (2018) Criteria and guidelines for employing architectural composition to support sustainable architecture. Int J Archit Eng Constr 7:41–55. https://doi.org/10.7492/IJAEC.2018.017
Shahda M, Megahed N (2022) Post-pandemic architecture: a critical review of the expected feasibility of skyscraper-integrated vertical farming (SIVF). Archit Eng Des Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2022.2109123
Shahda M, Elhafeez M, Elmokadem A (2018) Camel’s nose strategy: New innovative architectural application for desert buildings. Sol Energy 176:725–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.072
Shehata AO, Megahed NA, Shahda MM, Hassan AM (2022) (3Ts) Green conservation framework: a hierarchical-based sustainability approach. Build Environ 224:109523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109523
Shirzadi M, Mirzaei PA, Naghashzadegan M (2018) Development of an adaptive discharge coefficient to improve the accuracy of cross-ventilation airflow calculation in building energy simulation tools. Build Environ 127:277–290
Song Y, Darani KS, Khdair AI, Abu-Rumman G, Kalbasi R (2021) A review on conventional passive cooling methods applicable to arid and warm climates considering economic cost and efficiency analysis in resource-based cities. Energy Rep 7:2784–2820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.056
Taleghani M, Tenpierik M, van den Dobbelsteen A (2012) Environmental impact of courtyards—a review and comparison of residential courtyard buildings in different climates. J Green Build 7:113–136
Taleghani M, Tenpierik M, van den Dobbelsteen A (2014) Indoor thermal comfort in urban courtyard block dwellings in the Netherlands. Build Environ 82:566–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.028
A. Walker. (2010). Natural ventilation, Whole Build. Des. Guid. A Progr. Natl. Inst. Build. Sci
Wang J, Li J, Chen X (2010) Parametric design based on building information modeling for sustainable buildings, challenges environ. Sci Comput Eng 2:236–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/CESCE.2010.285
Wang J, Wei Q, Zhao L, Yu T, Han R (2018) An improved empirical mode decomposition method using second generation wavelets interpolation. Digit Signal Process 79:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2018.05.009
Yao R, Costanzo V, Li X, Zhang Q, Li B (2018) The effect of passive measures on thermal comfort and energy conservation. A case study of the hot summer and cold winter climate in the Yangtze River region. J Build Eng 15:298–310
K. Yeang, The green skycraper–The basis for designing sustainable intensive buildings, 1999, trad. cast, 1999.
Zhang K, Garg A, Mei G, Jiang M, Wang H, Huang S, Gan L (2022) Thermal performance and energy consumption analysis of eight types of extensive green roofs in subtropical monsoon climate. Build Environ 216:108982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108982
Zhao Y, Zhao K, Ge J (2022) Predicting the temperature distribution of a non-enclosed atrium and adjacent zones based on the Block model. Build Environ 214:108952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108952
Zhong H-Y, Sun Y, Shang J, Qian F-P, Zhao F-Y, Kikumoto H, Jimenez-Bescos C, Liu X (2022) Single-sided natural ventilation in buildings: a critical literature review. Build Environ 212:108797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108797
This research was not funded.
The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest to declare for this publication.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, R.A., Megahed, N.A., Shahda, M.M. et al. Natural ventilation as a passive cooling strategy for multi-story buildings: analytic vertical skycourt formations. City Territ Archit 10, 28 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-023-00212-6